Katherine
Taveras
Blog
post 1
Isolated
systems
Image from: http://www.sobremesamagazine.com/on-the-dominican-racial-crisis/ |
While
some may say the creation of the idea of race is necessary in creating social
categories and structures. It is imperative to understand that race is not innate
but rather a formulated concept to categorize people into further control. Institutionalized
in the mid 19th century race became the moral compass in which
people saw themselves. Through colonization this notion soon became a worldwide
view. In which people with white skin benefited from exponentially and those of
darker skin suffered from.
This
can be seen as one examines the island of the Hispaniola and its development
since the colonization of Christopher Columbus and the Spanish in 1492: one can
determined how the implication of race has created a divided nation. Originally
populated by the Arawak’s the island of Hispaniola was foreign to the concept
of race. This soon changed when the Spanish saw the monetary potential in the
island through gold and other commodities. With high demands and not enough
workers, the Spanish sought the acquisition of enslaved Africans, through the
slave trade. Which resulted in creating a melting pot of people and cultures. However,
through the process of racialization the Spanish ensured to not only separate
themselves from both the Arawak’s and the Africans but to ensure themselves as
the dominant race. Through the notion of superiority and inferiority, imposed
by the Spanish is how I believe race came to be in the island of the
Hispaniola.
Previous
academic courses have all shed meaning to the concept of race, in which led me
too interpret race as the concept of categorizing individuals into groups based
on ones heritage. However, early lessons presented in this class have further
educated me in understanding race not only as a developed concept but also as a
concept that has been imposed on humanity and used as a form of control.
Furthermore, how race is used to oppress those who are not members of the
superior race, giving rise to the evils of racism.
When
considering the importance of race and why it persists in the Hispaniola it is
important to understand the correlation between nation and race. Today we know
the island as the Dominican Republic and Haiti. As both countries became
colonized by different nations, different ways of life and culture were
adapted. Eugenio Matibag states “they are separate and unequal: Haiti has a
predominantly black, French Patois- speaking population; the Dominican
Republic, a predominantly mestizo or mulatto, Spanish-speaking population”
(pg.1) while this quote states the factual information of the countries it underlines
the root of racism between the countries. Most Dominican people considered
themselves mulattos, which is a mix between Europeans and Africans this is
often thought of as being more “white”. It is this belief that creates a notion
of superiority over Haitian people. Over time this has been the reason for
endless massacres and crimes against the Haitian people. Furthermore,
Dominicans benefit from oppressing Haitians through abuse of labor and
resources.
References:
Matibag, Eugenio. Haitian-Dominican Counterpoint: Nation,
State, and Race on Hispaniola.
First ed. New York: PALGRAVE
MACMILLAN, 2003. Print.
Edward, Paulino. Dividing Hispaniola:
The Dominican Republic's Border Campaign Against
Haiti,
1930-1961. Pittsburgh:
University of Pittsburgh Press, 2016. Print.
Haiti &
the Dominican Republic: An Island divided. Narr. Henry L. Gates. PBS, 2011. Film.
Hazoury,
Lissete. "To Be Dominican is to Not Be Haitian: Development of Dominican
Racial Identity through Antihaitianismo and the Indio Myth." sobremesa
magazine 2016. Print.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHi Katherine. I realized I couldn't see your image, I used a different web browser and it still didn't show up. Also apart from that, I see you have the website the image was from. I don't know if the professor want the website or the actual person, but still, the source was there. Something to be careful about is the grammar and punctuation. Something to also consider is the reference section. I only see one in-text citation but I believe he wanted 2. In APA in-text citations, I think it goes like (Authorslastname pg. 12). Also, I believe he wanted the links inside the blog post. I think there could have been a better title selection choice because it doesn't reflect the full potential of your blog post.
ReplyDelete